Over the course of three modules, you will gain an understanding of how scientific evidence is developed by learning about the 1) scientific method, 2) the peer-review process, and 3) logic-based thinking. In the first module, the scientific method, you will learn how scientific studies are designed, and evaluate a study's merit and conclusions based on the data and observations made. In the second module, the peer review process, you will be walked through each step of the scientific peer-review process, ensuring that the information being conveyed is independently verified by external experts in the field. In the third module, introduction to logic-based thinking, you will learn about inductive and deductive reasoning, and apply deductive reasoning to scientific processes. You will also learn how scientific evidence can build into theories and laws, as well as the limitations of what science can examine.

 

For each module, you will have a short assignment to help apply the knowledge gained. Once complete, you will demonstrate your understanding of the material via a short paper, determining whether a chosen topic is based in science or pseudoscience and backing up your logic with evidence. 

 

By the end of this course, you should be able to:

• apply the steps of the scientific method to design controlled experiments, with a specific hypothesis, control and experimental groups, appropriately identified variables (independent, dependent, control), presentation of results, and conclusions based on the data and prior evidence presented.

• describe the peer-review process within scientific literature.

• use deductive reasoning, the scientific method, and evidence-based logic to critically evaluate key aspects of an experimental design.

• systematically differentiate evidence-based information from pseudoscientific information based on your understanding of scientific process, reasoning, and critical thought.